Skip to content
LaSocialOffline
Create
Join

Civic · Community issue · Mobility · Paris

Cycle lane blocked by deliveries every morning

How would you like to take part?

Vans park on the lane between 7 and 10; cyclists swerve into traffic.

  1. Draft
  2. Submitted
  3. Under review
  4. Open for discussion
  5. Developing
  6. Proposal
  7. Prioritisation
  8. Decision / recommendation
  9. Implementation
  10. Monitoring
  11. Completed
  12. Evaluation

What this is: Community idea

Written by residents. It carries no official status.

Who decides: Nobody has decided anything yet. A community idea can become a recommendation through a group or assembly; only the organisation with authority can make an authorised decision, and it must record it here.

Follow · 16Support · 30I would help build it · 14 ShareCalendar (.ics)

Understand

Overview

Vans park on the lane between 7 and 10; cyclists swerve into traffic.

Understand first, then take part: ask a question or add what you know →

Participate

Deliberation (16)

Questions (1)

  • Question A resident (collected by Hugo V.) 2026-09-03 · With a facilitator

    Has anything like this been tried nearby, and what happened?

Arguments (2)

  • Argument A participant from Paris 2026-06-04

    Any furniture must not narrow the path for cyclists and pushchairs.

    27 agree · 8 disagree · 2 unsure
  • Argument A resident (collected by Alexis E.) 2026-06-25 · At a meeting

    Using local artisans keeps the budget in the neighbourhood.

    17 agree · 1 disagree · 11 unsure

Evidence (1)

  • Evidence (with source) Pauline T. 2026-06-02

    The regional health agency publishes heatwave guidance recommending shaded rest points every 300–500 m for older people.

    Source: Open data portal and survey report

Concerns (1)

  • Concern Salomé F. 2026-06-11

    Tree planting takes years to give shade; people need something this summer.

    10 agree · 6 disagree · 7 unsure

Alternatives (1)

  • Alternative A resident (collected by Louis S.) 2026-07-24 · By phone

    Plant trees now and install temporary shade sails until they grow.

    4 agree · 0 disagree · 9 unsure

Common ground (1)

  • Common ground Thomas K. 2026-07-30

    Everyone agrees the path should stay accessible to wheelchairs and pushchairs.

    23 agree · 7 disagree · 5 unsure

Unresolved issues (1)

  • Unresolved issue A resident (collected by Capucine F.) 2026-05-31 · On paper

    Who maintains the planters after the first year is still unclear.

Experiences, opinions & suggestions (8)

  • Opinion Pauline K. 2026-05-19

    I would rather see a small trial first than a big plan that takes five years.

  • Personal experience Awa Z. 2026-05-28

    As a delivery rider I use this route daily — the problem is worst between 7 and 9.

  • Suggestion Bastien J. 2026-06-03

    Combine this with the existing Saturday clean-up so volunteers are already there.

    14 agree · 2 disagree · 0 unsure
  • Personal experience Yvette R. 2026-07-04

    I walk here every morning with my mother; there is nowhere to sit for 800 metres.

  • Suggestion A resident (collected by Pauline K.) 2026-07-09 · With a facilitator

    Combine this with the existing Saturday clean-up so volunteers are already there.

    11 agree · 4 disagree · 1 unsure
  • Personal experience A resident (collected by Awa Z.) 2026-07-16 · By phone

    As a delivery rider I use this route daily — the problem is worst between 7 and 9.

  • Personal experience A participant from Paris 2026-08-28 · At a meeting

    We moved here two years ago and it took us months to find out this existed.

  • Opinion A resident (collected by Océane C.) 2026-09-12 · On paper

    I think the priority should be the people who use it most, not the people who pass through.

Consensus map

Broad agreement (2)

70 % or more of respondents agree

  • Combine this with the existing Saturday clean-up so volunteers are already there.16 responses · Suggestion
  • Any furniture must not narrow the path for cyclists and pushchairs.37 responses · Argument

Partial agreement (3)

50–69 % agree

  • Using local artisans keeps the budget in the neighbourhood.29 responses · Argument
  • Combine this with the existing Saturday clean-up so volunteers are already there.16 responses · Suggestion
  • Everyone agrees the path should stay accessible to wheelchairs and pushchairs.35 responses · Common ground

Disagreement (0)

under 50 % agree and at least 30 % disagree

    Needs more information (2)

    40 % or more unsure, or no clear pattern

    • Tree planting takes years to give shade; people need something this summer.23 responses · Concern
    • Plant trees now and install temporary shade sails until they grow.13 responses · Alternative

    Not enough responses yet (0)

    fewer than 8 responses

      How this is calculated. Only statements (arguments, concerns, alternatives, suggestions, common ground) can be weighed, once per person, as agree, disagree or unsure. Shares are of the people who responded to that statement — not of residents, and not of everyone on the platform. Popularity is not truth: a statement with broad agreement can still be wrong, and a minority concern can be decisive. Nothing here is a vote or a decision. Full methodology

      Proposal

      Beneficiaries
      Residents of the neighbourhood

      The author would take part in implementation: maybe.

      People & project

      Find people to build this with you

      • 2 people in Paris are interested in this subject
      • 4 have skills this needs (Teaching, Translation)
      • 0 have organised events before
      • 0 local Cercles discuss related subjects

      Counts include everyone whose profile is visible to members; only people who chose to be visible to you appear below. Nobody’s location is shown beyond their city.

      The team

      No project team yet.

      Volunteer roles

      No roles published yet.

      Resources needed

      No open requests.

      Process & meetings

      Meetings

        Response

        Illustrative response — shows how a response appears once received; not the position of a real authority.

        Services of the city of Paris — example response interface Under review 2026-08-07

        Illustrative response: the service is examining feasibility and cost and has asked for photos and usage information from residents.

        Proposed or requested action
        Keep the initiative updated and share photos of the site.
        Timeline & follow-up
        Status update within six weeks.
        Next step
        Feasibility check → answer published here → next step agreed with the team.

        The chain: public contribution → responsible organisation → review → response → action → implementation → outcome. A response is not a decision unless it is recorded as one by the organisation with authority.

        Implementation

        Implementation has not started. It follows a decision or recommendation and a responsible team.

        Outcome

        No outcome yet. When it is completed, the outcome is documented here: what was asked, answered, built and learnt.

        Continue

        Start the next initiative from this one

        Network

        1. People68 taking part
        2. ResponseUnder review

        History on the record

        1. Submitted — Published; waiting to be read.
        2. Under review — Moderators or the responsible organisation are reading it.
        3. Open for discussion — Questions, evidence, arguments and alternatives are welcome.

        Local discovery profile

        Get the participation briefing for your city

        One email a month: new initiatives, meetings and outcomes near you. No political profiling — you choose the subjects.

        1. You tell us what you are looking for.
        2. A person — the organiser, host or our team — answers by email.
        3. You meet in person, when you are ready.