Skip to content
LaSocialOffline
Create
Join

Civic · Community issue · Community facilities · Strasbourg

School yard locked at weekends

How would you like to take part?

The only open space in the block is the school yard, locked Friday to Monday.

  1. Draft
  2. Submitted
  3. Under review
  4. Open for discussion
  5. Developing
  6. Proposal
  7. Prioritisation
  8. Decision / recommendation
  9. Implementation
  10. Monitoring
  11. Completed
  12. Evaluation

What this is: Community idea

Written by residents. It carries no official status.

Who decides: Nobody has decided anything yet. A community idea can become a recommendation through a group or assembly; only the organisation with authority can make an authorised decision, and it must record it here.

Follow · 20Support · 38I would help build it · 19 ShareCalendar (.ics)

Understand

Overview

The only open space in the block is the school yard, locked Friday to Monday.

Understand first, then take part: ask a question or add what you know →

Participate

Deliberation (16)

Questions (1)

  • Question A resident (collected by Agathe W.) 2026-09-02 · By phone

    What would it cost to maintain each year, not just to build?

Arguments (2)

  • Argument A participant from Strasbourg 2026-07-25 · With a facilitator

    Maintenance should be planned from the start or the benches will be removed in two years.

    11 agree · 1 disagree · 3 unsure
  • Argument A resident (collected by Sophie H.) 2026-09-11 · On paper

    Using local artisans keeps the budget in the neighbourhood.

    7 agree · 4 disagree · 5 unsure

Evidence (1)

  • Evidence (with source) Diego J. 2026-07-23

    The city’s open-data portal lists footfall counts for this area; weekday mornings are the peak.

    Source: Open data portal and survey report

Concerns (1)

  • Concern Diego J. 2026-08-21

    Tree planting takes years to give shade; people need something this summer.

    4 agree · 1 disagree · 9 unsure

Alternatives (1)

  • Alternative A resident (collected by Inès L.) 2026-08-12 · At a meeting

    Move the rest points to the park entrances instead of the quay itself.

    4 agree · 0 disagree · 15 unsure

Common ground (1)

  • Common ground Diego J. 2026-06-28

    Everyone agrees the path should stay accessible to wheelchairs and pushchairs.

    26 agree · 7 disagree · 0 unsure

Unresolved issues (1)

  • Unresolved issue Diego J. 2026-07-28

    Whether the budget covers lighting as well as seating is not settled.

Experiences, opinions & suggestions (8)

  • Suggestion Agathe W. 2026-06-02

    Start with a one-month trial using removable furniture.

    9 agree · 4 disagree · 3 unsure
  • Personal experience Alain M. 2026-06-04

    We moved here two years ago and it took us months to find out this existed.

  • Opinion Agathe W. 2026-06-11

    I think the priority should be the people who use it most, not the people who pass through.

  • Personal experience A participant from Strasbourg 2026-06-24 · On paper

    As a delivery rider I use this route daily — the problem is worst between 7 and 9.

  • Suggestion A resident (collected by Agathe W.) 2026-07-16 · By phone

    Start with a one-month trial using removable furniture.

    11 agree · 3 disagree · 7 unsure
  • Personal experience A resident (collected by Inès L.) 2026-08-04 · At a meeting

    As a delivery rider I use this route daily — the problem is worst between 7 and 9.

  • Opinion A resident (collected by Alain M.) 2026-08-10 · With a facilitator

    I would rather see a small trial first than a big plan that takes five years.

  • Personal experience Alain M. 2026-08-31

    We moved here two years ago and it took us months to find out this existed.

Consensus map

Broad agreement (2)

70 % or more of respondents agree

  • Everyone agrees the path should stay accessible to wheelchairs and pushchairs.33 responses · Common ground
  • Maintenance should be planned from the start or the benches will be removed in two years.15 responses · Argument

Partial agreement (2)

50–69 % agree

  • Start with a one-month trial using removable furniture.16 responses · Suggestion
  • Start with a one-month trial using removable furniture.21 responses · Suggestion

Disagreement (0)

under 50 % agree and at least 30 % disagree

    Needs more information (3)

    40 % or more unsure, or no clear pattern

    • Move the rest points to the park entrances instead of the quay itself.19 responses · Alternative
    • Tree planting takes years to give shade; people need something this summer.14 responses · Concern
    • Using local artisans keeps the budget in the neighbourhood.16 responses · Argument

    Not enough responses yet (0)

    fewer than 8 responses

      How this is calculated. Only statements (arguments, concerns, alternatives, suggestions, common ground) can be weighed, once per person, as agree, disagree or unsure. Shares are of the people who responded to that statement — not of residents, and not of everyone on the platform. Popularity is not truth: a statement with broad agreement can still be wrong, and a minority concern can be decisive. Nothing here is a vote or a decision. Full methodology

      Proposal

      Beneficiaries
      Residents of the neighbourhood

      The author would take part in implementation: yes.

      People & project

      Find people to build this with you

      • 0 people in Strasbourg are interested in this subject
      • 2 have skills this needs (Carpentry, Design)
      • 0 have organised events before
      • 0 local Cercles discuss related subjects

      Counts include everyone whose profile is visible to members; only people who chose to be visible to you appear below. Nobody’s location is shown beyond their city.

      People appear here once they make their profile visible.

      The team

      No project team yet.

      Volunteer roles

      Resources needed

      Process & meetings

      Meetings

      No meeting yet.

      Response

      Illustrative response — shows how a response appears once received; not the position of a real authority.

      Services of the city of Strasbourg — example response interface Under review 2026-09-02

      Illustrative response: the service is examining feasibility and cost and has asked for photos and usage information from residents.

      Proposed or requested action
      Keep the initiative updated and share photos of the site.
      Timeline & follow-up
      Status update within six weeks.
      Next step
      Feasibility check → answer published here → next step agreed with the team.

      The chain: public contribution → responsible organisation → review → response → action → implementation → outcome. A response is not a decision unless it is recorded as one by the organisation with authority.

      Implementation

      Implementation has not started. It follows a decision or recommendation and a responsible team.

      Outcome

      No outcome yet. When it is completed, the outcome is documented here: what was asked, answered, built and learnt.

      Continue

      Start the next initiative from this one

      Network

      1. People78 taking part
      2. ResponseUnder review

      History on the record

      1. Submitted — Published; waiting to be read.
      2. Under review — Moderators or the responsible organisation are reading it.
      3. Open for discussion — Questions, evidence, arguments and alternatives are welcome.
      4. Developing — People are working the idea into something buildable.
      5. Proposal — A structured plan with costs, risks and outcomes.

      Local discovery profile

      Get the participation briefing for your city

      One email a month: new initiatives, meetings and outcomes near you. No political profiling — you choose the subjects.

      1. You tell us what you are looking for.
      2. A person — the organiser, host or our team — answers by email.
      3. You meet in person, when you are ready.