Skip to content
LaSocialOffline
Create
Join

Communities · Volunteer initiative · Education · Lille

Homework help in the community centre

How would you like to take part?

Parents cannot help with homework in French; children fall behind.

  1. Draft
  2. Submitted
  3. Under review
  4. Open for discussion
  5. Developing
  6. Proposal
  7. Prioritisation
  8. Decision / recommendation
  9. Implementation
  10. Monitoring
  11. Completed
  12. Evaluation

What this is: Community idea

Written by residents. It carries no official status.

Who decides: Nobody has decided anything yet. A community idea can become a recommendation through a group or assembly; only the organisation with authority can make an authorised decision, and it must record it here.

Follow · 27Support · 50I would help build it · 26 ShareCalendar (.ics)

Understand

Overview

Parents cannot help with homework in French; children fall behind.

Understand first, then take part: ask a question or add what you know →

Participate

Deliberation (11)

Questions (0)

None yet.

Arguments (2)

  • Argument A participant from Lille 2026-06-20

    Any furniture must not narrow the path for cyclists and pushchairs.

    17 agree · 2 disagree · 6 unsure
  • Argument A resident (collected by Léa P.) 2026-08-12 · At a meeting

    Rest points would let older residents keep walking independently for longer.

    12 agree · 0 disagree · 8 unsure

Evidence (1)

  • Evidence (with source) Mei M. 2026-07-28

    A 2023 survey by the neighbourhood council found 61 % of respondents over 70 avoided the route in summer.

    Source: Open data portal and survey report

Concerns (1)

  • Concern Sarah W. 2026-08-30

    Benches could attract noise late at night near homes.

    6 agree · 12 disagree · 3 unsure

Alternatives (1)

  • Alternative A resident (collected by Aurélie J.) 2026-06-14 · By phone

    Move the rest points to the park entrances instead of the quay itself.

    8 agree · 8 disagree · 17 unsure

Common ground (0)

None yet.

Unresolved issues (0)

None yet.

Experiences, opinions & suggestions (4)

  • Opinion A resident (collected by Charlotte F.) 2026-07-02 · On paper

    This seems worth doing, but only if local residents are involved in maintaining it.

  • Personal experience A resident (collected by Aurélie J.) 2026-07-16 · By phone

    I walk here every morning with my mother; there is nowhere to sit for 800 metres.

  • Suggestion A resident (collected by Moussa W.) 2026-07-17 · With a facilitator

    Combine this with the existing Saturday clean-up so volunteers are already there.

    13 agree · 0 disagree · 14 unsure
  • Personal experience Nathan L. 2026-07-23

    We moved here two years ago and it took us months to find out this existed.

Progress feedback and evaluation

  • Monitoring feedback A resident (collected by Yvette T.) 2026-05-22 · With a facilitator

    Great to see the planters watered by the school children.

  • Monitoring feedback A resident (collected by Léa P.) 2026-08-19 · On paper

    The path was partly closed without notice on Friday; please post closures here.

Consensus map

Broad agreement (0)

70 % or more of respondents agree

    Partial agreement (1)

    50–69 % agree

    • Any furniture must not narrow the path for cyclists and pushchairs.25 responses · Argument

    Disagreement (1)

    under 50 % agree and at least 30 % disagree

    • Benches could attract noise late at night near homes.21 responses · Concern

    Needs more information (3)

    40 % or more unsure, or no clear pattern

    • Move the rest points to the park entrances instead of the quay itself.33 responses · Alternative
    • Combine this with the existing Saturday clean-up so volunteers are already there.27 responses · Suggestion
    • Rest points would let older residents keep walking independently for longer.20 responses · Argument

    Not enough responses yet (0)

    fewer than 8 responses

      How this is calculated. Only statements (arguments, concerns, alternatives, suggestions, common ground) can be weighed, once per person, as agree, disagree or unsure. Shares are of the people who responded to that statement — not of residents, and not of everyone on the platform. Popularity is not truth: a statement with broad agreement can still be wrong, and a minority concern can be decisive. Nothing here is a vote or a decision. Full methodology

      Proposal

      Beneficiaries
      Residents of the neighbourhood

      The author would take part in implementation: yes.

      People & project

      Find people to build this with you

      • 4 people in Lille are interested in this subject
      • 0 have skills this needs (Writing, Photography)
      • 0 have organised events before
      • 0 local Cercles discuss related subjects

      Counts include everyone whose profile is visible to members; only people who chose to be visible to you appear below. Nobody’s location is shown beyond their city.

      The team

      No project team yet.

      Volunteer roles

      Resources needed

      Process & meetings

      Meetings

        Response

        Illustrative response — shows how a response appears once received; not the position of a real authority.

        Services of the city of Lille — example response interface Accepted 2026-08-20

        Illustrative response: the service agrees to support this in the form described, with the conditions listed below.

        Proposed or requested action
        Keep the initiative updated and share photos of the site.
        Timeline & follow-up
        Status update within six weeks.
        Next step
        Feasibility check → answer published here → next step agreed with the team.

        The chain: public contribution → responsible organisation → review → response → action → implementation → outcome. A response is not a decision unless it is recorded as one by the organisation with authority.

        Implementation

        1. Concept
        2. Preparation
        3. Running the programme
        4. Completion
        5. Evaluation
        66%Progress
        1 200 €Spent so far
        2026-10-07 — progress reviewNext milestone
        2Updates
        1. 2026-08-20 · Running the programme · 66% · Illustrative update

          First sessions held

          Good turnout; two volunteers trained others.

          Milestone: Running

        2. 2026-08-03 · Preparation · 20% · Illustrative update

          Team formed and plan agreed

          Roles shared out at the first meeting; materials listed.

          Milestone: Plan agreed

        Community monitoring

        Follow progress, ask questions, give feedback, report problems, submit evidence, suggest improvements.

        Outcome

        No outcome yet. When it is completed, the outcome is documented here: what was asked, answered, built and learnt.

        Continue

        Start the next initiative from this one

        Network

        1. People99 taking part
        2. ResponseAccepted
        3. Implementation66% complete

        History on the record

        1. Submitted — Published; waiting to be read.
        2. Under review — Moderators or the responsible organisation are reading it.
        3. Open for discussion — Questions, evidence, arguments and alternatives are welcome.
        4. Developing — People are working the idea into something buildable.
        5. Proposal — A structured plan with costs, risks and outcomes.
        6. Prioritisation — Where the process allows, people help set priorities.
        7. Decision / recommendation — A recommendation is made, or an authorised body decides.
        8. Implementation — It is being built, run or carried out.

        Local discovery profile

        Get the participation briefing for your city

        One email a month: new initiatives, meetings and outcomes near you. No political profiling — you choose the subjects.

        1. You tell us what you are looking for.
        2. A person — the organiser, host or our team — answers by email.
        3. You meet in person, when you are ready.