Skip to content
LaSocialOffline
Create
Join

Civic · Community issue · Youth · Lille

No evening place for teenagers in Wazemmes

How would you like to take part?

Teenagers meet in the car park because there is nowhere open after 6 pm.

  1. Draft
  2. Submitted
  3. Under review
  4. Open for discussion
  5. Developing
  6. Proposal
  7. Prioritisation
  8. Decision / recommendation
  9. Implementation
  10. Monitoring
  11. Completed
  12. Evaluation

What this is: Community idea

Written by residents. It carries no official status.

Who decides: Nobody has decided anything yet. A community idea can become a recommendation through a group or assembly; only the organisation with authority can make an authorised decision, and it must record it here.

Follow · 3Support · 3I would help build it · 2 ShareCalendar (.ics)

Understand

Overview

Teenagers meet in the car park because there is nowhere open after 6 pm.

Understand first, then take part: ask a question or add what you know →

Participate

Deliberation (12)

Questions (1)

  • Question A resident (collected by Sarah W.) 2026-06-09 · At a meeting

    Has anything like this been tried nearby, and what happened?

Arguments (2)

  • Argument A participant from Lille 2026-06-13 · By phone

    Any furniture must not narrow the path for cyclists and pushchairs.

    25 agree · 11 disagree · 0 unsure
  • Argument Sarah W. 2026-07-05

    Maintenance should be planned from the start or the benches will be removed in two years.

    24 agree · 4 disagree · 6 unsure

Evidence (1)

  • Evidence (with source) Yvette T. 2026-07-30

    A 2023 survey by the neighbourhood council found 61 % of respondents over 70 avoided the route in summer.

    Source: Open data portal and survey report

Concerns (1)

  • Concern Jeanne S. 2026-05-19

    Tree planting takes years to give shade; people need something this summer.

    13 agree · 13 disagree · 7 unsure

Alternatives (1)

  • Alternative A resident (collected by Moussa K.) 2026-06-16 · On paper

    Plant trees now and install temporary shade sails until they grow.

    3 agree · 0 disagree · 9 unsure

Common ground (1)

  • Common ground A resident (collected by Fatou C.) 2026-05-22 · With a facilitator

    All sides agree maintenance must be budgeted from the start.

    5 agree · 3 disagree · 4 unsure

Unresolved issues (1)

  • Unresolved issue Aurélie J. 2026-06-17

    Who maintains the planters after the first year is still unclear.

Experiences, opinions & suggestions (4)

  • Personal experience A resident (collected by Moussa K.) 2026-06-16 · On paper

    I run the Saturday market stall opposite and see this every week.

  • Personal experience A resident (collected by Léa P.) 2026-07-01 · With a facilitator

    My children’s school is next door; parents have raised it at every meeting.

  • Opinion Léa P. 2026-08-29

    I think the priority should be the people who use it most, not the people who pass through.

  • Suggestion A resident (collected by Yvette T.) 2026-09-05 · At a meeting

    Ask the retirement home and the primary school to co-design it.

    9 agree · 5 disagree · 4 unsure

Consensus map

Broad agreement (1)

70 % or more of respondents agree

  • Maintenance should be planned from the start or the benches will be removed in two years.34 responses · Argument

Partial agreement (2)

50–69 % agree

  • Any furniture must not narrow the path for cyclists and pushchairs.36 responses · Argument
  • Ask the retirement home and the primary school to co-design it.18 responses · Suggestion

Disagreement (1)

under 50 % agree and at least 30 % disagree

  • Tree planting takes years to give shade; people need something this summer.33 responses · Concern

Needs more information (2)

40 % or more unsure, or no clear pattern

  • All sides agree maintenance must be budgeted from the start.12 responses · Common ground
  • Plant trees now and install temporary shade sails until they grow.12 responses · Alternative

Not enough responses yet (0)

fewer than 8 responses

    How this is calculated. Only statements (arguments, concerns, alternatives, suggestions, common ground) can be weighed, once per person, as agree, disagree or unsure. Shares are of the people who responded to that statement — not of residents, and not of everyone on the platform. Popularity is not truth: a statement with broad agreement can still be wrong, and a minority concern can be decisive. Nothing here is a vote or a decision. Full methodology

    Proposal

    Beneficiaries
    Residents of the neighbourhood

    The author would take part in implementation: yes.

    People & project

    Find people to build this with you

    • 3 people in Lille are interested in this subject
    • 2 have skills this needs (Carpentry, Design)
    • 0 have organised events before
    • 0 local Cercles discuss related subjects

    Counts include everyone whose profile is visible to members; only people who chose to be visible to you appear below. Nobody’s location is shown beyond their city.

    The team

    No project team yet.

    Volunteer roles

    No roles published yet.

    Resources needed

    No open requests.

    Process & meetings

    Meetings

    No meeting yet.

    Response

    Illustrative response — shows how a response appears once received; not the position of a real authority.

    Services of the city of Lille — example response interface Under review 2026-08-14

    Illustrative response: the service is examining feasibility and cost and has asked for photos and usage information from residents.

    Proposed or requested action
    Keep the initiative updated and share photos of the site.
    Timeline & follow-up
    Status update within six weeks.
    Next step
    Feasibility check → answer published here → next step agreed with the team.

    The chain: public contribution → responsible organisation → review → response → action → implementation → outcome. A response is not a decision unless it is recorded as one by the organisation with authority.

    Implementation

    Implementation has not started. It follows a decision or recommendation and a responsible team.

    Outcome

    No outcome yet. When it is completed, the outcome is documented here: what was asked, answered, built and learnt.

    Continue

    Start the next initiative from this one

    Network

    1. People11 taking part
    2. ResponseUnder review

    History on the record

    1. Submitted — Published; waiting to be read.
    2. Under review — Moderators or the responsible organisation are reading it.
    3. Open for discussion — Questions, evidence, arguments and alternatives are welcome.

    Local discovery profile

    Get the participation briefing for your city

    One email a month: new initiatives, meetings and outcomes near you. No political profiling — you choose the subjects.

    1. You tell us what you are looking for.
    2. A person — the organiser, host or our team — answers by email.
    3. You meet in person, when you are ready.